Heads of terms
Getting the heads of terms right shapes the rest of the deal — price structure, deferred consideration, warranties scope, restrictive covenants and exclusivity all need clear, honest first positions.
An SME acquisition isn't a smaller version of a £100m deal — it's a different kind of transaction with different risks, different paperwork and a different rhythm. The Oxford acquisitions we work on are usually founder-to-founder, share purchases of established trading businesses, and the work that makes them succeed is done in the first three weeks, not the last three.
Oxford-area buyers and sellers of established trading SMEs — typically £500k to £15m enterprise value, in technology, professional services, engineering and consumer sectors. We act for both buyers and sellers, but not on the same deal.
Oxford's deal flow at SME scale is dominated by founder exits, family-business successions and bolt-on acquisitions by mid-sized regional buyers. The diligence patterns and SPA negotiation rhythm are predictable — but the human dynamics around a founder exit need active management alongside the legal work.
Commercial matters involving Oxford businesses are typically dealt with at the Oxford Combined Court for County Court proceedings and Reading Employment Tribunal for employment claims. The commercial counterparty mix is shaped by the University, the NHS trusts around the John Radcliffe and the deep concentration of research-led occupiers at Begbroke, Harwell and the Oxford Science Park.
Getting the heads of terms right shapes the rest of the deal — price structure, deferred consideration, warranties scope, restrictive covenants and exclusivity all need clear, honest first positions.
A focused, risk-weighted DD process that surfaces the issues that will actually affect price or terms — not a 200-question generic questionnaire.
Negotiating the share purchase agreement around the warranties, disclosure letter, indemnities, restrictive covenants and completion mechanics.
Relevant: Companies Act 2006
Where the seller is staying on, the SPA, service agreement and earn-out have to work together — and frequently don't, in our experience.
Heads of terms that quietly bind on key commercial points without the seller realising.
We make sure the heads are properly framed as non-binding on commercial points, with only confidentiality and exclusivity binding.
Warranties that the buyer can't realistically rely on because they weren't properly disclosed against.
We work through a structured disclosure letter that protects the seller and gives the buyer a defensible position.
Earn-outs that look reasonable on paper and become litigation magnets on completion.
We draft earn-out mechanics around clear, measurable, audit-friendly metrics — not generic EBITDA targets.
Speak to Radcliffe Enterprise Law for clear, commercial legal advice — by phone, video or in person.
Start the conversation